According to text, Andrew Perlman wrote that ChatGPT “is a machine learning system, it may not have the same level of understanding and judgment as a human lawyer when it comes to interpreting legal principles and precedent. This could lead to problems in situations where a more in-depth legal analysis is required”, it is possible to say that
- A human judgment has come to an end for analysis of legal principles and precedent.
- B ChatGPT quickly resolves all question regarding the interpretation of legal principles and precedent.
- C American laws prohibit the interpretation of legal principles and precedent by ChatGPT.
- D there may be harm if the interpretation of legal principles and precedent by ChatGPT is used for difficult legal analysis.